Wednesday, December 28, 2011
Friday, December 23, 2011
Thursday, December 22, 2011
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Monday, December 19, 2011
Time Frames
Questions? Post your comments below and I will address them.
Friday, December 16, 2011
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Video on My BIDU Scalp
Please ask me some questions if you want me to cover something else in a video --- enjoy!
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Monday, November 28, 2011
Occupy Wall Street movement
|
Thursday, November 17, 2011
Occupy Wall Street Crowd Blind to Benefits of Capitalism
"Occupy Wall Street Crowd Blind to Benefits of
Capitalism"
By Gary Wolfram
William Simon Professor of Economics and Public Policy
Hillsdale College
William Simon Professor of Economics and Public Policy
Hillsdale College
Whenever
I watch
media coverage of another Occupy Wall Street event I am reminded of an
exchange between Jewish protesters in the 1979 Monte Python movie Life
of
Brian. One of the protesters asks another what the Romans have brought
to the area and the conversation goes like this:
Question: All right, but apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads,
the fresh water system and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
Answer: Brought peace?
Response: Oh, peace - shut up!
The
point is that the Roman institutions brought a good deal to the
area that was being overlooked by the protesters. The Wall Street
protesters, in their hatred of capitalism, overlook things including the
fact that
over the last 100 years capitalism has reduced poverty more and
increased life expectancy more than in the 100,000 years prior. Answer: Brought peace?
Response: Oh, peace - shut up!
Every semester I ask my students: "What would you rather be? King of England in 1263 or you?" Turns out, students would rather be themselves. They enjoy using their iPhone, indoor plumbing, central heating, refrigerators and electric lighting. All of these things are available to the average person in America today and none of them were available to the aristocracy when the West operated under the feudal system.
How is it that for thousands of years mankind made very little progress in increasing the standard of living and yet today half of the goods and services you use in the next week did not exist when I was born? It wasn't that there was some change in the DNA such that we got smarter. The Greeks knew how to make a steam engine 3,000 years ago and never made one. The difference is in how we organize our economic system. The advent of market capitalism in the mid 18th century made all of the difference.
We need not just rely on historical data. Look at cross-section evidence. I try another experiment with my students. I tell them they are about to be born and they can choose whatever country in the world they would like to be born in. The only caveat is they will be the poorest person in that country. Every student picks a country that is primarily organized in a market capitalist system. No one picks a centrally planned state. No one says, "I want to be the poorest person in North Korea, Cuba, or Zimbabwe," countries which are at the bottom of the Heritage Foundation's Index of Economic Freedom.
What does it mean to be poor in our capitalist society that the Occupy Wall Street crowd so hates? Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation has several studies of those classified as poor by the U.S. Census Bureau. He found that 80 percent of poor persons in the United States in 2010 had air conditioning, nearly three quarters of them had a car or truck, nearly two-thirds had satellite or cable television, half had a personal computer and more than two-thirds had at least two rooms per person.
Contrast this with what it means to be poor in Mumbai, India, a country that is moving rapidly towards market capitalism but was burdened for decades with a socialist system. A recent story in The Economist described Dharavi, a slum in Mumbai, where for many families half of the family members must sleep on their sides in order for the entire family to squeeze into its living space.
The Occupy Wall Street movement has shown a lack of understanding of how the market capitalist system works. They appear to think that the cell phones they use, food they eat, hotels they stay in, cars they drive, gasoline that powers the cars they drive and all the myriad goods and services they consume every day would be there under a different system, perhaps in more abundance.
But there is no evidence this could be or ever has been the case. The reason is that only market capitalism solves the two major problems that face any economy-how to provide an incentive to innovate and how to solve the problem of decentralized information. The reason there is so much innovation in a market system compared to socialism or other forms of central planning is that profit provides the incentive for innovators to take the risk needed to come up with new products.
My mother never once complained that we did not have access to the latest Soviet washing machine. We never desired a new Soviet car. The socialist system relies on what Adam Smith referred to as the benevolent butcher and while there will undoubtedly be benevolent butchers out there, clearly a system that provides monetary rewards for innovators is much more dynamic and successful. The profit that the Occupy Wall Street protesters decry is the reason the world has access to clean water and anti-viral drugs.
The other major problem that must be solved by any economic system is how to deal with the fact that information is so decentralized. There is no way for a central planner to know how many hot dogs 300 million Americans are going to want at every moment in time. A central planner cannot know the relative value of resources in the production of various goods and services. Market capitalism solves that problem through the price system. If there are too few hot dogs, the price of hot dogs will rise and more hot dogs will be produced. If too many hot dogs are produced, the price of hot dogs will fall and fewer will be produced.
Market capitalism is the key to the wealth of the masses. As Ludwig von Mises wrote in his 1920 book, Socialism, only market capitalism can make the poor wealthy. Nobel Laureate Friedrich Hayek in his famous 1945 paper, The Use of Knowledge in Society, showed that only the price system in capitalism can create the spontaneous order that ensures that goods will be allocated in a way that ensures consumers determine the use of resources. The Occupy Wall Street movement would make best use of its time and energy in protesting the encroachment of the centrally planned state that led to the disaster of the Soviet Union, fascist Germany, and dictatorial North Korea.
Monday, October 31, 2011
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Monday, September 26, 2011
Monday, September 19, 2011
Friday, August 19, 2011
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Monday, May 2, 2011
Monday, April 25, 2011
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Friday, March 25, 2011
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Oil Will Be Gone in 50 Years
There could be less than 49 years of oil supplies left, even if demand were to remain flat according to HSBC’s senior global economist Karen Ward.
"Energy resources are scarce," Ward said in a research note. "Even if demand doesn’t increase, there could be as little as 49 years of oil left." "Gas is less of a constraint, but transporting it and using it to meet transport demand is a major issue," she said. "Coal is the most abundant with 176 years left, but this is the worst carbon culprit."
If supplies were not constrained, the world would see a 110 percent jump in demand by 2050, equivalent to 190 million barrels a day, to fuel growth in the emerging world, Ward said.
But unless someone finds major new reserves this will not be possible and other sources of energy will need to be found.
"Energy security – defined in this instance as domestic energy production per head of population – will be an increasing concern," she said. "Diversifying to natural gas to ease the pressure on the oil market won’t overcome it since its supply is as geographically dense as oil."
Ward said she believes the most "energy insecure" regions are Europe, Latin America and India and predicts Europe in particular will find its energy situation getting worse.
"Europe is the big loser with many countries falling down or out of the league table of economic size," she said. "They could be losing their influence on the world stage just at the time when they are most vulnerable."
No Fast Cars
The threat of global warming is not going away and its impact will be most keenly felt in the developing world, HSBC said.
"The ‘solution’ requires greater energy efficiency and a switch in the mix of energy as well as using ‘carbon capture’ technology to limit the damage of fossil fuel use," Ward said.
"We have become terribly complacent in the way in which we use energy," she added. "The lowest hanging fruit is in the transport sector. Smaller, more efficient cars will get you from A to B, just not as quickly."
As the Japanese authorities work around the clock to avoid a nuclear disaster there is a risk that nuclear power generation will see investment cut back at a time when it was expected to play a far bigger role.
"If Fukushima results in a two-decade freeze on plans, as we saw following the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, then renewable energy will have to play an even larger role, or efficiency improvements would have to accelerate further," Ward said. "A reduced role for nuclear energy would make meeting carbon limits even more challenging."
"Government foresight on a scale not seen for 40 years will be needed to chart the route for the next 40 – at a time when the public sector in the OECD has perhaps the least capacity in decades to make strategic investments in new infrastructure."
Sunday, March 20, 2011
10 Companies with Heavy Sales in Japan
Looking to Short Something?
Have a look here!
Aflac (NYSE:AFL) $50.67 per share:
Coach (NYSE:COH) $49.83 per share:
Freeport McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) $51.78 per share:
Tiffany (NYSE:TIF) $57.29 per share:
Hartford Financial (NYSE:HIG) $25.49 per share:
Adobe Systems (NASDAQ:ADBE) $31.99 per share:
Corning (NYSE:GLW) $20.75 per share:
Waters Corp (NYSE:WAT) $83.57 per share:
Qualcomm (NASDAQ:QCOM) $51.71 per share:
Boston Scientific (NYSE:BSX) $7.20 per share:
http://wallstcheatsheet.com/trading/10-u-s-companies-with-a-heavy-reliance-on-japanese-sales.html
Have a look here!
Aflac (NYSE:AFL) $50.67 per share:
Coach (NYSE:COH) $49.83 per share:
Freeport McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) $51.78 per share:
Tiffany (NYSE:TIF) $57.29 per share:
Hartford Financial (NYSE:HIG) $25.49 per share:
Adobe Systems (NASDAQ:ADBE) $31.99 per share:
Corning (NYSE:GLW) $20.75 per share:
Waters Corp (NYSE:WAT) $83.57 per share:
Qualcomm (NASDAQ:QCOM) $51.71 per share:
Boston Scientific (NYSE:BSX) $7.20 per share:
http://wallstcheatsheet.com/trading/10-u-s-companies-with-a-heavy-reliance-on-japanese-sales.html
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Friday, January 28, 2011
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)